Movie Review - Penny Serenade (1941)

An unremarkable (by today's standards) childrearinganymore. But why did they have to go to Japan to
melodrama in which Cary Grant delivers aarrive at that point is a moot script question that is
performance so good that he was nominated for aleft unanswered. Couldn't the same fate befall Julie if
Best Actor Oscar. George Stevens directed theshe had another accident closer to home? Why did
script by Morrie Ryskind.The whole movie unfolds asthey have to go all the way to Japan, is not clear.
a series of linear flashbacks, each triggered by the LPThe whole "Tokyo episode" stands out like a joke
records a disconsolate Julie (Irene Dunne) is playingwithout a punch line.The rest of this drama unfolds as
on a gramophone just before she leaves her housethe story of the married couple's desperate effort to
for good. The reason? There does not seem to beadopt a child, and once adopted, not to lose
anything left in her marriage to keep her there. Weher.There is yet another "baby sequence" in the
are soon to learn the reason why and all the tragicmiddle of the movie which could easily be part of an
events that led her to that wistful moment.The firstunrelated comedy. Grant again excels in this
couple of times the revolving LP record dissolves intosequence, almost paying tribute to the early years he
a "memory hole" through which we enter a slice ofspent during his teens as a pantomime and acrobat
life in Julie's past, we enjoy it as a manifestation of awith Bob Pender's troupe. We see the young couple
director's creativity. But the sixth or the seventh timegoing through many of the anxieties in taking care of
that happens, we wonder how many times we havetheir adopted 5-week daughter. (Is she asleep or did
to suffer the same unrelentingly mechanical idea. Itshe quit breathing?)They are so inexperienced, they
gets old pretty quickly proving that consistency isdon't even know how to hold a baby or bath her and
not always a virtue.Cary Grant plays the young andchange her diaper.But we can't also help notice the
dashing newspaper reporter Roger Adams whoprogress of a father-daughter bonding between
marries the love of his life Julie (played by IreneGrant and his infant daughter despite the fact that
Dunne) on the eve of his departure to Tokyo tooriginally he asked for a 2-year old boy "with blond
take over his newspaper's Japan bureau. It alsocurly hair and blue eyes."For the first couple of years
happens to be the Christmas night, complete withRoger's newly established weekly newspaper
the obligatory snowfall (as in another Cary Grantbusiness, helped by the press veteran Applejack,
movie, BISHOP'S WIFE (1948)).Once established inseems to be making the ends meet. But then his
Tokyo, Roger has Julie join him at his new opulentbusiness takes a sudden downturn and suddenly he is
digs complete with a family of Japanese housea man without an income.Since they are still at a
servants. Julie is both delighted and astonished that"probationary period" in their adoption process, the
Roger can sustain that level of luxury with only aever-vigilant adoption agency in the person of Miss
reporter's salary. We remember an earlier scene inOliver (Beulah Bondi) takes Roger to court. The judge
which her friend Applejack (Edgar Buchanan) warnedis supposed to take the girl back because a family
her against getting involved with a journalist. Is therewithout income is not a fit place for any child to
something shady about Roger or past that we wouldgrow up in.However, Cary grant in yet another
know about yet?Two interesting things happenexcellent scene, delivers this really emotional
during the "Tokyo sequence" that bring both Roger'smonologue about the pain of separation from his
character and the script's strength into question.Indaughter, and the absurdity of taking a child back as
the first scene, Roger announces Julie that he hasthough she was a car or a furniture repossessed
quit his job thanks to his family inheritance. Now theybecause the owner has been late in payments. His
can go travel around the world before they settleappeal as a heartbroken father wins the day and the
down and raise a family, although during their datingjudge allows him to take her back home.After so
period Roger showed some reluctance to suffermany spinning gramophone records dissolving into
pranks of children (the beach scene) gladly.It turnsflashback scenes, we watch the child grow and take
out what Roger calls "an inheritance" is just about tena small part in a Christmas play at school as her very
thousand dollars, which shrinks further down toproud parents watch her and give all their support
$8,000 after he pays his outstanding bills. It is a letdespite a minor mishap on the stage that ruins her
down for Julie. He accuses Roger by acting "childishly."day.Then disaster strikes, as it should in a tragedy.
We'll see this pattern for the rest of the movie:We read in a letter written to Miss Oliver that the
Roger will always come across as a man with grandchild has died following an illness. Since up to that
ideas and much self-confidence who, however, can'tpoint we have not seen a single scene in which the
deliver the bacon at the end.The second importantchild suffered from any physical ailments, this also
development in the "Tokyo sequence" is thecomes across as contrived a plot point as the earlier
earthquake that levels their home. As we continue to" Tokyo earthquake."After the death of their
watch to see the "payoff" of this totally unexpecteddaughter Roger and Julie's union starts to unravel
natural disaster, the film abruptly shifts back to Sanquickly. The girl was the bond that kept them
Francisco where Julie is lying in a hospital and shetogether.
learns that she will not be able to bear children