A Guide to Election Night for the Non-Political Junkie

Even if you are not a political junkie like I am, you willreasonably accurate result, provided it is random
still probably find yourself glued to your TV set onenough and varied enough among all demographic
election night. Obviously, you'll be waiting to find outgroups, geographic areas, etc. To use an analogy
whether President George W. Bush will be elected orthat I've often heard, you don't need to drink the
if Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts willwhole glass of tea to find out whether or not it's
become our 44th President. Will everything you seesweet. Just a taste will due, assuming the glass has
and hear that night be interesting? Will it even makebeen stirred properly. The other criticism is: "They
sense to you? Well, if all you are interested in isask intentionally misleading and confusing questions."
finding out who wins, you may be in for a long andThis is quite true of many political polls. However, the
boring night. Volumes of information will be presentedmain question asked during exit poling is: "For whom
that night before a final winner is declared. However,did you vote?". I wonder which part of that question
if you know a few things to look for, all of that stuffpeople wouldn't understand.As states are called, their
might make a lot more sense and actually beelectoral votes are placed into one candidate's
interesting as well.For one thing, you need to becolumn. Also, look for each news organization to
aware that there's only going to be a passiveutilize a map of the United States, which starts out
emphasis on the national popular vote, i.e., the totalwith each state depicted as white. As a state is
amount of votes cast nationally for each candidate.called for Bush, its color is changed to red; as a state
That's because it doesn't determine who wins - theis called for Kerry, its color is changed to blue; hence,
electoral votes do. In every state except Maine,the red states and blue states. Look for Kentucky to
Nebraska, and perhaps Colorado (more on that later),be the first state called. That state closes its polls at
the winner of that state receives all of its electoral6:00 Eastern Time and will almost certainly fall into
votes. Maine awards them by congressional district,Bush's column. Once a candidate reaches 270 or more
with the other two going to that state's overallelectoral votes, he will be declared the winner of the
winner. Nebraska awards its electoral voteselection, regardless of the total popular votes or how
proportionally, based on the percentage of themany red or blue states he has earned.If Bush wins
popular vote each candidate receives in thatall the states he won in 2000 and no more, he will
state.The number of electoral votes each state haswin by a larger margin (277-261) in the electoral
is calculated by adding the number of itscollege than he won by last time (271-267). Actually,
congressional districts to the number of its senators.he could lose one of his smaller states like New
The number of congressional districts each state hasHampshire, without picking up one that Gore won,
is based on its population. The more populous statesand still win the election. This is because, based on
like California and Texas have a lot morethe 2000 census, the population has shifted a bit and
congressional districts than more sparsely populatedsix congressional seats (and therefore the same
states like Wyoming or Vermont. However, everyamount of electoral votes) have shifted from "Gore"
state has at least one congressional district, nostates to "Bush" states.The key states to watch
matter how small its population. Every state hasthroughout the evening will be the so-called
exactly two senators. Therefore, every state has at"battleground" states. The candidate who wins the
least three electoral votes. In addition to all themajority of those states will likely win the election. By
states, the District of Columbia is allotted threemost estimates, these states include New Hampshire,
electoral votes, even though it has no votingPennsylvania, Florida, West Virginia, Ohio, Iowa,
members in Congress.Many people believe theWisconsin, Colorado, and New Mexico. Most of the
electoral college, the system of casting electoralother states are considered to already be in the
votes to determine the outcome of the presidentialcolumn of one candidate or the other. As a general
election, is inherently unfair and should be abolished inrule, Bush is expected to be strong in the south,
favor of a system in which the winner is determinedsouthwest, and mountain and prairie west. Kerry
purely by the national popular vote. Of course, itlooks to be strong in the northeast, upper Midwest,
would take a Constitutional amendment for that toand along the Pacific coast. I don't see any state
happen. Therefore, the electoral college is here tofurther west than New Mexico or Colorado being a
stay. Even if such amendment could get the requiredmajor decisive factor. It is already assumed that
two-thirds margin in the House and Senate, it wouldCalifornia, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii will all go
never be able to get the required three-quarters offor Kerry, while Alaska will go for Bush.Colorado could
the state legislatures. There are too many smallprove to be the most controversial this time, but
states that would be staunchly opposed to it, asonly if everything falls right. There is an initiative on
they feel that the electoral college allows them to bethe Colorado ballot to award its electoral votes
"players" in the presidential election campaign thatproportionally, instead of awarding all nine of them to
they would not be in a purely popular vote system.the winner, as it does now. If passed, this would go
These small states fear that they would beinto effect immediately with this election. Since the
completely ignored by presidential candidates, withoutrace in Colorado is expected to be close, the results
the electoral college. I fear that they are right.Manyof this measure would effectively take four electoral
states will be "called", i.e., a projected winner of thatvotes away from the winner of the state and give
state will be announced, by news organizations asthem to the loser. Therefore, if the measure passes
soon as the polls close in those states. This can beand the candidate who wins Colorado loses the
done fairly accurately with the use of exit polls, aelection by less than nine electoral votes, the
process by which voters are asked about theirmeasure will have cost that candidate the election.
decision as they are exiting their polling places. If theObviously, a major legal battle would ensue if that
exit polling sample alone from a given state shows ahappened.One final item to watch for on election
clear victory for one candidate, they will call thatnight is the battle for control of the House and the
state as soon as its polls close. If the exit polls showSenate. The Republicans currently hold a slim margin
that a given state is too close to call, they will waitin both houses. Several key wins, or "pick-ups," by
until enough of the actual vote count comes inthe Democrats could turn things around in their favor
before calling that state. Exit polls are sometimesin one house or possibly both. Conversely, some
wrong, though. The most infamous example waspick-ups by the Republicans could increase their
Florida in 2000, when it was called for Gore based onmargin in one or both house. Key races that could go
exit polling data and some of the actual results. Aftereither way will be monitored closely throughout the
more of the actual results started coming in,evening.Terry Mitchell is a software engineer from
however, the news organizations soon started toHopewell, VA. He operates a website, on which he
realize things might not go in Florida the way theyposts commentaries on various subjects such as
had projected, so they soon retracted their call andpolitics, technology, religion, health and well-being,
the state ultimately went to Bush.By the way, peoplepersonal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer
who say they never believe exit polls (or political pollsa unique point of view that is not often found in the
in general) will offer two main criticisms of them. Themainstream media. He rarely misses an opportunity to
first is: "They've never asked me." In actuality, veryassail political correctness and take pot shots at the
few voters are ever contacted by pollsters. Only aconventional foolishness. Mr. Mitchell is also a trivia
very small sample of voters is needed to get abuff.