Protecting Intellectual Property

"Lawsuits primarily benefit the attorneys and nobodythe presentation, MBA was informed that Harley
else."wouldn't be
- Bryce's LawINTRODUCTIONThe protection ofpurchasing our product, and that Arthur Young
intellectual property should be a significant concern towould be developing a similar methodology for Harley
all Information Technology organizations. Withoutinstead. This made MBA suspicious, particularly since
protection, commercial hardware/software vendorsone of Young's consultants was a former "PRIDE"
would quickly evaporate as others would inevitablyuser. Consequently, MBA initiated a lawsuit over
steal their designs and programs. Corporatemisappropriation of trade secrets.This turned into a
developers would also suffer if their ideas, inventions,long and ugly legal battle which lasted eight years.
and programs were misappropriated thereby causingBasically, the lawyers for the opposition contended
them to lose their competitive advantage. In fact,that since the "PRIDE" materials had copyright
our corporate landscape and standard of living wouldnotation printed on them, they were in the public
be radically different if we had no such protection.domain. In contrast, it was our contention that
Fortunately, the framers of the U.S. Constitution"PRIDE" was a trade secret, In the end, we won the
were wise enough to implement legislationlawsuit and "PRIDE" was proven to be a trade secret
safeguarding the authorship and ownership ofin a court of law. This litigation established many
literature, art, and inventions, thus causing the Unitedprecedents and is often referenced in similar cases;
States to flourish in the arts and sciences. But thefor additional information, see:Chicago-Kent College of
advent of the computer caused us to reconsiderLaw
how we safeguard such property. For example, theLaw
concept of a computer program has been a bityears have gone by since the verdict was passed.
nebulous to some people; should the source code beIn 1989, Arthur Young & Company merged with
protected by copyright? What about the objectErnst and Ernst (now called Ernst & Young), the
code (executable)? Attorneys have been debatingprincipals of the case have moved on and we no
this subject over the last thirty years and there is stilllonger bear any ill-will towards the company. Further,
general confusion in the field.In 1974, MBA embarked"PRIDE" was placed on the Internet in 2004 (with
on our own lawsuit to protect the "PRIDE"copyright notation).As a result of the lawsuit, MBA
methodology. This was a lengthy legal battle whichlearned a lot about the protection of intellectual
took the courts into unchartered waters. At theproperty. I may not be an attorney, but you may
time, "PRIDE" was nothing more than a methodologylook upon this as a convenient primer to protect
implemented with printed manuals and forms (noyourself.COPYRIGHTSCopyright is primarily concerned
software support at the time). To safeguard ourwith the authorized reproduction of such things as
product, our lawyers drafted a standardtext, graphics, music, and audio/video recordings. As
nondisclosure agreement which all prospective buyerssuch, it protects publishers, authors, artists, and
would sign prior to our sales presentation. Further, ourdesigners from unauthorized republication or
contracts included similar verbiage instructing theredistribution of their work. Not too long ago, in order
customer to safeguard the physical embodiment offor a copyright to be enforceable, it had to be
the product and not to divulge it to unauthorizedregistered with the copyright office. However, the
third parties.We were contacted by Arthur Young &laws were somewhat loosened in 1976 whereby
Company in 1974 to conduct a "PRIDE" salescopyright protection is now effective from the
presentation for one of their consulting clients inmoment the work is first created in fixed form.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin; the Harley DavidsonAlthough the use of copyright notation is no longer
Motorcycle Company (then a division of AMF). Themandatory, it is highly beneficial to include it
attendees signed the nondisclosure agreement andwhenever possible to indicate your work is protected
the presentation was conducted as usual. Followingby copyright.